Top 44 Cloning Quotes

We’re not interested in cloning the Michael Jordans and Michael Jacksons of the world, but rather assisting infertile couples that deserve the right to have a biological child to have one.

There are two kinds of cloning right now. One is therapeutic cloning which is for coming up with cures for life threatening, really, really awful diseases. Then there is reproductive cloning, which is to make a human being out of your DNA and a donor egg.

I don’t get jealous of other girls, because I was… raised in a cloning lab to be the perfect woman for Hugh M. Hefner, so, other than the fact that my I.Q.’s probably a little higher than he would like, I have nothing to worry about.

If one is seriously interested in preventing reproductive cloning, one must stop the process before it starts.

I’m trying to grow more limbs in order to multitask at a greater rate and I’m also investigating the possibilities of cloning. Because nothing would be more useful than having multiples of me, and that way, I could do all of the things I’d like to do in the short amount of time we all have here.

Cloning represents a very clear, powerful, and immediate example in which we are in danger of turning procreation into manufacture.

I don’t get jealous of other girls, because I was… raised in a cloning lab to be the perfect woman for Hugh M. Hefner, so, other than the fact that my I.Q.’s probably a little higher than he would like, I have nothing to worry about.

We’ve had cloning in the South for years. It’s called cousins.

I don’t believe that efforts to prohibit only so-called reproductive cloning can be successful.

If out of concern over cloning, the U.S. Congress succeeds in criminalizing embryonic stem-cell research that might bring treatments for Alzheimer‘s disease or diabetes – and Dr. Fukuyama lent his name to a petition that supported such laws – there would be real victims: present and future sufferers of those diseases.

I am opposed to both cloning and the destruction of human embryos and adamantly opposed to funding of embryonic stem cell research.

At some point, someone will come up with an airtight argument as to why they should have a cloned child. At that point, cloning will be acceptable.

We are not interested in cloning the Michael Jordans and the Michael Jacksons of this world. The rich and the famous don’t participate in this.

The people who make policy decisions should damned well know what they are talking about before they make the decisions. There is nobody who is an expert on cloning who would be afraid after seeing Attack of the Clones.

Humans are something very different from animals, and the numbers required to get cloning to work in animals are completely prohibitory with humans.

If you took some famous religious leader, for example, and said it would be nice to clone them indefinitely so you have a dynasty of leaders, my own guess would be that each time the cloning takes place, they would become more and more defective, presumably mentally defective and subsequently worse.

I don’t believe that efforts to prohibit only so-called reproductive cloning can be successful.

During this period, I became interested in how the new techniques of cloning and sequencing DNA could influence the study of genetics and I was an early and active proponent of the Human Genome Sequencing Project.

Simon Cowell is trying to get everyone to clone their dogs, and we’ve had our dogs ‘done‘ so they can’t have puppies any more. Cloning is like modern day reproducing – reproducing the bits you want.

Cloning is great. If God made the original, then making copies should be fine.

I think we can allow the therapeutic uses of nuclear transplant technology, which we call cloning, without running the danger of actually having live human beings born.

The people who make policy decisions should damned well know what they are talking about before they make the decisions. There is nobody who is an expert on cloning who would be afraid after seeing Attack of the Clones.

The argument has been made in Congress that it is slippery slope if you allow therapeutic, what people people are calling therapeutic cloning, then you will get reproductive cloning.

During this period, I became interested in how the new techniques of cloning and sequencing DNA could influence the study of genetics and I was an early and active proponent of the Human Genome Sequencing Project.

The federal and state governments should ban the use of taxpayer funds to support cloning and embryonic stem cell research.

I take the view that anything you can do to relieve suffering or improve human health will usually be widely accepted by the public – that is to say, if cloning actually turned out to be solving some problems and was useful to people, I think it would be accepted.

The cloning procedure is similar to IVF. The only difference is that the DNA of sperm and egg would be replaced by DNA from an adult cell. What law or principle – secular, humanist, or religious – says that one combination of genetic material in a flask is OK, but another is not?

I am in favor of stem-cell research. I am not in favor of creating new human embryos through cloning.

If one is seriously interested in preventing reproductive cloning, one must stop the process before it starts.

In cloning, in contrast, reproduction is asexual – the cloned child is the product not of two but of one.

Cloning interferon was not something I wanted to get into.

I laughed when Steven Spielberg said that cloning extinct animals was inevitable. But I’m not laughing anymore, at least about mammoths. This is going to happen. It’s just a matter of working out the details.

I’ve been opposed to human cloning from the very beginning.

Cloning looks like a degrading of parenthood and a perversion of the right relation between parents and children.

We live in a science fictional world with things like cloning and face transplants, and things seem to be getting stranger and stranger.

No one would want to read a book in which I explain the science of cloning because it would be very dull and it would also make no sense.

Cloning, wow. Who would have thought? There should be a list of people who can and cannot clone themselves.

I would not want to see any relaxation of the law prohibiting human cloning.

The irrationality of disgust suggests it is unreliable as a source of moral insight. There may be good arguments against gay marriage, partial-birth abortions and human cloning, but the fact that some people find such acts to be disgusting should carry no weight.

The cloning of humans is on most of the lists of things to worry about from Science, along with behaviour control, genetic engineering, transplanted heads, computer poetry and the unrestrained growth of plastic flowers.

Cloning represents a very clear, powerful, and immediate example in which we are in danger of turning procreation into manufacture.

It’s very hard to make arguments about the effects of cloning on family relations if family relations are in tatters.

If society becomes comfortable with cloning and sees value in true human diversity, then the whole Neanderthal creature itself could be cloned by a surrogate mother chimp – or by an extremely adventurous female human.

Humans are something very different from animals, and the numbers required to get cloning to work in animals are completely prohibitory with humans.